It produces monochrome archives at about $0.05 per page or $26.67 per ream of paper. This low score was for the most part because of its highly contrasting printing costs. This was simply over the base score of 2, and wealthy from the top score of 7. The PIXMA MX922 fared ineffectively in our cost testing, gaining a 4. Nonetheless, this quality was very useful for an inkjet, and most perusers wouldn’t see any outright issues when scrutinizing pages created by the PIXMA MX922. Characters looked intense and dim, yet there was some pixelation and irregularities on the edges, particularly with littler textual styles. It scored a 5 in our content quality testing, which was a normal score in a metric that had scores extending somewhere in the range of 2 and 9. The PIXMA MX922 creates sensibly great content. Be that as it may, in the event that you print any kind of volume you’ll set aside cash over the long haul with an increasingly proficient model. On the off chance that you just need to print or sweep rarely, this is a genuinely economical approach to bring those abilities into your home. It was additionally one of the slowest models we tried, working at not exactly a third the speed of the quickest model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |